The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

10 amazing pictures taken a second before the tragedies
10 amazing pictures taken a second before the tragedies

An ordinary photograph can be stored for many decades — it can be a photograph that will shake your faith in humanity, or a ...

The Urine Tax in Ancient Rome, or Why Money Doesn't Smell
The Urine Tax in Ancient Rome, or Why Money Doesn't Smell

The phrase "money has no smell" is familiar to everyone. But not everyone knows that its origins date back to the distant ...

Etzi's "Ice Man" and his story
Etzi's "Ice Man" and his story

In 1991, on the Similaun glacier, which is located in the Tyrolean Alps, two German tourists discovered a perfectly preserved body ...

Related articles

Underwater Baroque by Christy Lee Rogers
Underwater Baroque by Christy Lee Rogers

The pictures of Christy Lee Rogers from Hawaii are distinguished by an unusual style: her works are surprisingly similar to the ...

Aliens Among Us: An Inverted face that resembles an alien
Aliens Among Us: An Inverted face that resembles an alien

Have you ever noticed that if you turn a photo of a human face upside down, what you see seriously resembles the physiognomy of a ...

Rare shots from a photo shoot of 16-year-old Angelina Jolie in underwear
Rare shots from a photo shoot of 16-year-old Angelina Jolie ...

Star photographer Sean McCall has published unknown shots of a young Angelina Jolie from a photo shoot in 1991. Then the future ...