The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

Detective in ancient Roman style, or How Emperor Tiberius solved the crime
Detective in ancient Roman style, or How Emperor Tiberius ...

In ancient Rome there was no such thing as an investigator or detective. Any crime was investigated in court and, as a rule, the ...

The Hikikomori phenomenon: why modern youth become hermits
The Hikikomori phenomenon: why modern youth become hermits

Everyone has a need for solitude. Sometimes you want to be alone and not see anyone, not only strangers, but also loved ones. ...

Why do men wear watches on their left hand
Why do men wear watches on their left hand

Traditionally, men wear watches on their left hand. They say that the rules of etiquette require this, but no one can explain what ...

Related articles

Monsters of the deep sea in the photo by Alexander Semyonov
Monsters of the deep sea in the photo by Alexander Semyonov

These mysterious creatures resemble creatures that live on another planet. The depths of the seas and oceans are filled with life, ...

Are the two from the casket the same face? How do twins differ from each other
Are the two from the casket the same face? How do twins ...

For more than twenty years, French photographer Dominique Delpoux has been creating portrait images that highlight important social ...

Rock ' n ' roll on the other side of the lens
Rock ' n ' roll on the other side of the lens

Photographers Patty Boyd, Henry Diltz, Joel Bernstein, and Graham Nash, who is also known for the band Crosby, Stills, Nash & ...