The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

The ergonomics on the contrary: in different cities around the world are struggling with the homeless
The ergonomics on the contrary: in different cities around ...

Scenic and wild homeless have become an integral part of the landscape of the big city. Wherever there are horizontal any surface ...

20 photos of little Muscovites of the early 1960s
20 photos of little Muscovites of the early 1960s

In early 1960, American photographer and journalist Carl Midans, commissioned by LIFE magazine, made a series of stunning color ...

The most severe Russian photographer
The most severe Russian photographer

The seemingly dangerous photos were actually taken under the close attention of trainers. This is how the shots turned out with a ...

Related articles

Advertising and sex in the works of photographer Sean Dufresne
Advertising and sex in the works of photographer Sean Dufresne

We present you a selection of positive and sexy works by the American master of advertising photography Sean Dufren. Sean lives in ...

The spirit of the ancestors: in a Papuan tribe smoked mummies of leaders to save them for posterity
The spirit of the ancestors: in a Papuan tribe smoked mummies ...

Papua New Guinea continues to amaze the primitive culture of their own peoples. Italian photographer managed to capture the unusual ...

Forest nymphs from the magical worlds of Lamb Lorek
Forest nymphs from the magical worlds of Lamb Lorek

Agnieszka Lorek prefers the mysterious thickets of Welsh forests to ordinary photo studios. She creates images of beautiful models ...