The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

Why do we say "Hello" when we answer the phone?
Why do we say "Hello" when we answer the phone?

When we pick up the phone, the first word we say is usually "Hello". It happens automatically, and we rarely think about ...

The death of the microbes: how often should you wash your hands and why
The death of the microbes: how often should you wash your ...

"Wash your hands before eating!" — a phrase familiar to us since childhood. The parents explained that with the help of this ...

Baby Mandy and her "father" - illustrator Dean Eagle
Baby Mandy and her "father" - illustrator Dean Eagle

Dean Yeagle is an American artist, illustrator, cartoonist and animator. During his life, this talent has created a huge number of ...

Related articles

"I've been chasing this leopard hour and a half": the history of the creation of the legendary the best shots of wildlife photographer David yarrow
"I've been chasing this leopard hour and a half": the history ...

Photographer David yarrow (David Yarrow) spent half his life chasing elephants on the dusty fields of Kenya and looking for a black ...

Most impressive photos of Antarctica beginning of the XX century
Most impressive photos of Antarctica beginning of the XX century

James Francis Hurley (James Francis Hurley), known by the name of Frank Hurley (Frank Hurley) — the most famous Australian ...

"Who are you without an expensive camera?": the photographer responded to the haters with cool shots taken on a soap dish
"Who are you without an expensive camera?": the photographer ...

Phillip Haumesser is a self-taught professional photographer whose works have appeared in many world publications. Homesser learned ...