The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

Eight stupid things every Girl Does on a First Date
Eight stupid things every Girl Does on a First Date

We have prepared this material especially for men. Instructions for use on the first date it can not be called-women's logic is ...

The disappearance of the beaumont children: the mysterious crime that went unsolved
The disappearance of the beaumont children: the mysterious ...

It's been more than half a century since the disappearance of the beaumont children. In the process of investigation was nominated ...

Dreams, reality, desolation and urban studies in the fantastic paintings by the artist Jacob Brostrup
Dreams, reality, desolation and urban studies in the ...

Paintings by the Dutch artist Jacob Brostrup (Jacob Brostrup) can not leave indifferent even the person far from art. Fantastic ...

Related articles

Rock ' n ' roll on the other side of the lens
Rock ' n ' roll on the other side of the lens

Photographers Patty Boyd, Henry Diltz, Joel Bernstein, and Graham Nash, who is also known for the band Crosby, Stills, Nash & ...

As residents of the Italian town many centuries shared bread and salt with mummies
As residents of the Italian town many centuries shared bread ...

In the Italian town Venzone in the province of Udine people have long lived side by side with the mummies. Drank tea with them, had ...

11 photos of charming Marilyn Monroe by photographer Sam Shaw
11 photos of charming Marilyn Monroe by photographer Sam Shaw

In July 1957, a close friend of Marilyn Monroe, photographer Sam Shaw, arranged a photo shoot for the actress on the beach in ...