Rich Chinese girl saw in the series own bedroom with the reclining actress

The owner of a suburban Villa experienced a great shock while watching TV when I realized that this show was filmed in the mansion without her knowledge.

A court in China has ordered two producers of television shows and real estate company to pay a total of 400,000 yuan (63 000 USD) for the use of their country villas for the filming of "soap operas" without permission.

Madam Lin in 2014 bought a Villa in the seaside district Cixi 30 million yuan ($4.6 million U.S. dollars). Because it most of the year living in Hangzhou, in 2015, the Chinese signed the relevant company a contract for maintenance of their property in her absence, and gave them the keys.

This took advantage of the same company allowed a camera crew for a decent fee to arrange in the house shooting the series, without the knowledge and the consent of the owner of the Villa. And it was repeated more than once.

Ms. Lin said that he understood: her house was used by other people, only when I watched the show called "heart-to-heart Dialogue" in Hangzhou in September 2019. The woman was shocked on the screen the main character is sleeping in her own bed.

At the end of 2019 Lin gave to the people's court suit against Cixi Ningbo Film & TV Art Company that produces the series, and company property management. A year later, she added the list of the accused the producer of another TV series, "love", after he learned that the scene is also shot on her Villa.

The woman claims that only this house was filmed more than 60 scenes, including the master bedroom. And in the end had suffered considerable damage, including broken glass, damaged carpets, broken Elevator and worn furniture.

Lin demanded a total of one million yuan (153 000 US dollars) for the invasion of his Villa and property damage. In addition, she sued on multiple web sites, the leading live video, violation of privacy, with the requirement to pay her two million yuan (306 000 USD).

The court ordered the two manufacturing companies and the management company to divide the damages among themselves, rejecting the claim Lin privacy. According to the court, as the property was presented to the public as a fully furnished model house, and the woman had not made any changes in its environment, the house should not be construed as personal space. Lawyer Lin said that they will appeal this decision: