Not in the camera case! Here are pictures of expensive and cheap camera
"Bought an expensive SLR — automatically become a photographer". Such is the common view among most people. But ordinary people do not realize that it is much more important than price in photography — the ability to use it.
It may seem that if you pay for the camera more money, then he will shoot better, and the model in the pictures will look more beautiful. But not so! Photographer Mikhail Petrov known under the name Pikabu Zelibon conducted an experiment and found that indeed the difference between the chambers is very difficult to notice. (Hereinafter — the words of the author)
Actually it really interesting. There is of course already a lot of these experiments, but I wanted to spend. What is actually the case? You have no idea how many times I have been asked what camera to buy to get started:
And that shit a couple times a month.
Through a week-a month after purchase, usually starts the second round.
We know why pictures are the shit, right? Not in the camera case!
Took 2 sets of machinery:
Nikon d750 + Sigma 50 mm Art (the Price is about 100k + 50K = 150K) — what I usually shoot.Nikon d3200 + Nikon 35 mm 1,8 G (Price on avito approximately 8K + 7K = 15K) — what I suggest for a beginner.
Took the same footage (RAW of course), are equally treated (because I always treat this probably half of the final result, and some filmed in Jpg fuckup***NYM white balance, and then the camera shit pictures shit, a model for a scary and life — decay!), here are a few final pictures. One cheap, one expensive.
Want to try your hand and understand which camera shot which picture?
Of course, in the comments, there are experts who say that the difference can be seen with the naked eye. There are those who say that there is no difference, but I had a tripod with the same pictures to remove, and then zoom in to 100% and masturbate on pixels. etc. But have you ever in real life doing this? NO! You see photos on social media, becauseshe in institucije in kontaktike on sittah different in number. And I think that it is necessary to compare in such conditions, not to make synthetics!
You distinguish photos from expensive and cheap camera? It is clear that there is a difference in photo quality and usability. But I am sure that relieves still not the camera but the photographer. Well VIDOS comparison, if you were wondering:
Thank you! All free!
Keywords: Nikon comparison | Camera