American sued the parents, threw his porn collection, 25 thousand dollars

American sued the parents, threw his porn collection, 25 thousand dollars

Categories: Conflict | North America

Many men keep the house collection - beer caps, stamps, cards, cars, and even more unexpected items. Of course, none of the owners of such "treasures" doesn't want to lose your things quite often gathered over the years. David werking of Indiana also was not thrilled when elderly parents consigned to the dustbin of his porn collection, lovingly compiled over 20 years.

American sued the parents, threw his porn collection, 25 thousand dollars

42-year-old David did not want to accept this arbitrariness and filed for their elders in the court. He claims to have lost not just a few packs of greasy dirty magazines and a box of disks, and this collection of rarities that have been painstakingly collected over the years. The court was filled with pain Amateur porn and awarded the parents of Workinga to compensate for the loss by paying 25 dollars (1.8 million rubles).

American sued the parents, threw his porn collection, 25 thousand dollars

David found a good job, rented a house and began packing for the move. Packing boxes, he found his chief treasure of my porn collection, which he began collecting in College, when I was very young. A collection of magazines, posters, video tapes and disks was impressive and there were 12 boxes!

A short investigation of the family revealed that pornographic rarities thrown by the parents of Werking. The elderly not only felt guilty after that arbitrariness, but on the contrary, was convinced that did a good thing. In response to the claims of the son, the father says:

American sued the parents, threw his porn collection, 25 thousand dollars

His collection of David were evaluated at least 28 thousand (2 million rubles). But assessing mental trauma received by the man who lost the most valuable thing was much harder. Therefore, working sued 86 thousand dollars (6 million) subject to moral damages.

In court, David's father behaved with dignity — he immediately confessed that he threw away the collection of son and did not show the slightest remorse. He only said that he fulfilled his parental duty, removing from the life of the son of abomination, which, according to him, is no less dangerous to humans than drugs.

American sued the parents, threw his porn collection, 25 thousand dollars

Unfortunately, we did not know that hides a precious collection of Werking. Perhaps it was even rare old editions of the magazine Hustler, the cover of which at the time was cast in public culture shock.

Keywords: Collection | Porn | Porn industry | The parents | The court

Post News Article

Recent articles

Girl, sheltered homeless cats
Girl, sheltered homeless cats

A series of works by photographer Brian VILS from new York, dedicated to girls, sheltered the homeless and abandoned cats. 'brien ...

The right to undress and sin
The right to undress and sin

American artist Lee Price is sure that eating is a completely natural process, but many are ashamed of their attitude to food, ...

How anthropologist Grover Krantz and his Dog Clyde became Museum exhibits
How anthropologist Grover Krantz and his Dog Clyde became ...

There is an unusual exhibit at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington. This is the skeleton of a man, on whose chest ...

Related articles

15 photos that will delight your inner perfectionist
15 photos that will delight your inner perfectionist

There are people who are able to notice beauty in every little thing around, and this skill they should definitely learn! We offer ...

25 jokers, who know how to amuse their women
25 jokers, who know how to amuse their women

What best supports your marriage or relationship, making them healthy and happy? Of course, a sense of humor. That's what makes the ...

20 funny optical illusions that occur in everyday life
20 funny optical illusions that occur in everyday life

Have you ever had is that in order to parse the image in the photo, you had to look at it two, three, or even more times! Of ...