The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Recent articles

The main stadium of the 2018 Olympics for $ 105 million will be demolished immediately after the Games
The main stadium of the 2018 Olympics for $ 105 million will ...

From February 9 to 25, 2018, the XXIII Winter Olympic Games will be held in Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea. And the Olympic stadium ...

The best black and white photos from the Black+White Photographer of the Year 2018 contest
The best black and white photos from the Black+White ...

The British edition of Black+ White Photography and Fujifilm held a black-and-white photography contest in search of the best photo ...

Not only inside: 12 most unusual, but effective ways to use vodka
Not only inside: 12 most unusual, but effective ways to use vodka

On January 31, Russia celebrates the birthday of Russian vodka. The holiday is unofficial, but it was on this day in 1865 that the ...

Related articles

"When the lights are out": a delightful photo project in which everyone will see something of their own
"When the lights are out": a delightful photo project in ...

Parisian photographer Julien Mauve is known for his ability to penetrate deeply into the nature of things. One of the Frenchman's ...

Positive from wildlife
Positive from wildlife

Wildlife photographer from Austria Julian Rad has a knack for capturing animals in unusual and funny style. He is the winner of the ...

The best photos of Sergey Maksimishin
The best photos of Sergey Maksimishin

Sergey Maksimishin is one of the most famous Russian photojournalists, a prize—winner and winner of a large number of ...