The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

Four teenage wives and 12 children: what else we didn't know about Charlie Chaplin
Four teenage wives and 12 children: what else we didn't ...

Charlie Chaplin is known throughout the world; his career as a silent film actor lasted 75 years, ending with his death. Chaplin ...

26 tips on how best to store food
26 tips on how best to store food

Do you like to cook, buy food for the future, but the short life of vegetables and fruits does not give you peace of mind? There is ...

"Eat your salad — don't mess with guys": what is a tattoo cover themselves vegans
"Eat your salad — don't mess with guys": what is a tattoo ...

Ideally, veganism involves not only the rejection of eating animal products. It is a way of life where there are products which ...

Related articles

Before they Disappear: The planet's remote and little-known tribes
Before they Disappear: The planet's remote and little-known ...

Photographer Jimmy Nelson loves to travel the world and learn new things. In his next photo project, he decided to explore in more ...

Little criminals of the Victorian era
Little criminals of the Victorian era

Pillowcases thieves, burglars shops and petty crooks juvenile offenders, which a hundred years ago in the UK flogged with rods, ...

Magyar poisoner of Nagyrev
Magyar poisoner of Nagyrev

In the early XX century in the Hungarian village Nagyrev formed a sort of killer syndicate consisting exclusively of women. From ...